Lash boost Facts – Verified Customer Reviews.
Rodan and Fields’ website features a display of over 2500 customer reviews.
Rodan and Fields Lash Boost reviews are mostly positive, with an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars from over 2500 customer reviews. Many favourable reviews state that Lash Boost improves the duration and volume of lashes.
At the time of publication, 1% (25 of these 2500+ Reviewers) had experienced a side effect – “Serums for the eyes and lashes.
Ginger Weaver reviewed eye to eye and lash serums on April 5, 2021. I began using these right away and noticed itching, swelling, and discolouration of my eyelids. I’ve reduced it to once a week so that I only react once a week rather than every day.”
Another popular Rodan and Fields Lash Boost analysis focuses on the serum’s inability to provide long-term results. To continue enjoying the advantages of the Rodan and Fields Lash Boost serum, you must continue to use it. “R+F Lash Boost Analysis by Charlene Smith on April 4, 2021, R+F Lash Boost Review After a year of using this formula, my lashes have not changed.”
Clinical and Consumer Study Lash Boost Facts
Via Rodan and Fields US Website – “Per cent of study participants who experienced an improvement in the appearance of:
- 90% fuller-looking lashes
- 85% longer-looking lashes
- 63% darker-looking lashes
Based on an 8-week US clinical and consumer study.”
Also, the findings are based on an 8-week clinical and consumer analysis conducted in the United States. According to the study’s findings, 90% of participants had fuller-looking lashes, 85% had longer-looking lashes, and 63% had darker-looking lashes. According to the website Influenster.com,
*Rodan and Fields are a cruelty-free skincare company. This means that Rodan and Fields don’t test ingredients or their skincare products on animals as a cruelty-free brand.
As Rodan + Fields does not put its products into animal testing. To check the safety and effectiveness of our formulations, we use alternative in-lab research approaches, unpaid paying participants, and sometimes, home office staff volunteers.